‘Man in the Dark’ by Paul Auster


Fiction – hardcover; Faber and Faber; 160 pages; 2008. Review copy courtesy of the publisher.

Paul Auster is one of those authors you either love or hate. He has a very dedicated cult following, but I have never been a member of that club.

The first Auster I read was Oracle Night, charmed in part by the coverline which claimed that “If you have never read Auster before . . . this is the place to start”. I didn’t really know what to expect, but I struggled with the cold detached prose style. And I simply didn’t “get” the storyline. And yet, months later, I was still thinking about the story and the characters. There was something there that had wormed its way into my brain and would pop into my consciousness when I least expected it. I began to worry that I had written off Auster before giving him a proper chance.

And so that is how I came to read what is probably his most famous novel — or series of novels — New York Trilogy.  And this time, kind of knowing what to expect, I fell in love with Auster’s style and his thematic exploration of stories within stories and of the loneliness of writing and the concept of parallel lives and the blurring of fiction and reality. I loved the book so much I couldn’t bring myself to read anything else by him, although I often pick up his novels in book stores, walk around with them under my arm for a bit and then, chicken that I am, return them to the shelves and opt for something that little bit safer.

Fast forward a couple of years and when I discovered there was a new Auster about to hit the shelves I asked Faber and Faber if they’d be kind enough to send me a review copy, and they very kindly obliged.

Man in the Dark is typical Auster fare. It contains stories within stories within stories, and it plays with the concept that people can inhabit more than one world. It also explores memory, and the differences, if any, between the real and imagined.

It is told through the eyes of August Brill, a 72-year-old invalid, who dreams up stories in his head as a way of overcoming his insomnia. One of these stories is about a young man who awakens in a parallel universe in which September 11 did not happen. The America he finds himself in is not the calm, peaceful nation one would expect but a country at war with itself resulting from the secession of New York and a host of other states unhappy with the 2000 election result that put George W. Bush in power.

It’s a horrifying glimpse of another world that might have been. It reads like something that Cormac McCarthy and Stephen King might have colluded on. It’s dark, menacing and incredibly realistic.

But this is but one narrative thread of Man in the Dark. There is another in which the grieving August Brill recounts his marriage and long life with his now dead but much-loved Sonia to his granddaughter, Katya, who also suffers from insomnia. Katya, too, is grieving for the loss of her boyfriend, Titus, who was murdered in Iraq, and she stalls her grief by watching world movies with her grandfather all day long.

Later, the story of Titus’s untimely death, is also spelled out. So what results is a novel composed of many different stories that share common themes including love, loss, loneliness, fear and war.

Man in the Dark is an immensely readable book that moves along at a fast pace, so fast that I was able to read it in one sitting. There’s little clutter, but there’s a lot of stuff going on, too much, probably, to absorb in one reading. Whether the diehard fans will like it as much as me remains to be seen, but I thought it was an enjoyable, affecting and thought-provoking read, one that I am sure will linger in my mind for a long time to come. Now, if only I was brave enough to explore more of his back catalogue.

10 thoughts on “‘Man in the Dark’ by Paul Auster

  1. Thanks for the review…I’ve read a couple of other Paul Auster books (Brooklyn Follies and Mr Vertigo) that I thouroughly enjoyed. Especially Mr Vertigo. Funnily, I didn’t enjoy The New York Trilogy as much but I think it’s because I didn’t quite know what to expect (mirroring your experience with Oracle Night). But Man In the Dark sounds right up my alley (echos of Philip K. Dick’s Man in the High Chair in some ways by the sound of it). I’ll definitely be putting that on my “to buy or to mooch” list. 🙂


  2. You were lucky to get an advance copy.
    Paul Auster seems to be handling the 9/11 topic really well. He really shows how the NYCers have been affected.
    A couple of 8/29 fictional works have been written, but I think that it’s too early to write about that.


  3. He does seem to be a love/hate writer. I find I have that relationship with his books. I’ve not exactly hated some but been so unmoved by them that I didn’t finish them. On the otherhand In the Country of Last Things and The Book of Illusions are two of my all time favorites. I’ve read each one three times so far.


  4. Lezlie, I rather suspect this book will appeal to those that have never read Auster before, if only because it’s very easy to read and the whole 9/11 thing is something everyone can relate to.
    Kinuk, I’m wondering if you meant Man in the High Castle?? (You have babies on the brain, hehe.) I’ve not read that book, but I do remember looking it up after I’d read Philip Roth’s The Plot Against America because it all sounded vaguely similar…
    Isabel, I had to google ‘8/29’ because I didn’t understand the reference. Have you read Naomi Klein’s Shock Doctrine (nonfiction) — she has quite a bit to say about Hurricane Katrina and the way it was handled.
    CB James, I’ll have to add those titles to my wishlist… Having read this book, I now think I should explore more of his back catalogue.


  5. Oh God…I can’t believe I did that. Very embarrassed.
    I did mean Man in the High Castle!..and I liked it way more than The Plot Against America, which sort of put me off Roth (have you read any good Roth books you could recommend?).


  6. Kinuk, it happens to all of us (making embarrassing comments, that is). I can’t recommend any Roth because, like you, I have only ever read The Plot Against America and I wasn’t overly impressed. I certainly didn’t feel a deep need to read anything else by him.
    Isabel, I read it a few months back — will post a review at some point — and thought it was eye-opening on so many levels.


  7. Kinuk, for Roth I would recommend American Pastoral, or the Zuckerman Bound series, which comprises The Ghost Writer, Zuckerman Unbound, The Anatomy Lesson and The Prague Orgy. These four are sometimes available in one volume as Zuckerman Bount. They are however quite reflexive and playful in their treatment of the relationship between character and author. For a much straighter book by Roth, I’ve just read his memoir of his father Patrimony, and I thought it was magnificent (watch my blog next week for a review). If you don’t like any of those, you probably don’t like Roth!


I'd love to know what you think, so please leave a comment below

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.