‘The Antagonist’ by Lynn Coady

The-antagonist

Fiction – hardcover; House of Anansi Press; 352 pages; 2011.

A misunderstood giant who confronts his past is the subject of Lynn Coady’s 2011 Giller Prize shortlisted novel The Antagonist.

The giant is Gordon “Rank” Rankin, adopted at birth by Sylvie and Gordon Senior, a well-meaning but mismatched couple — “The dad was a prick, the mom was a goddess” — who raise him in small town Canada.

A larger-than-normal child, Rank looks like a fully grown man by the age of 14. With this comes all kinds of complications — people treat him like an adult even though he’s just a teenage boy — and he struggles to get on with his father, a short, angry man, whom he realises he “could’ve taken” at just age six “if I’d wanted”.

Their relationship, which is largely the focus of this novel, becomes more strained when Sylvie is killed in a car accident, leaving Gordon Snr to raise 16-year-old Rank alone.

But Coady gives this tale of a difficult father-son relationship a new twist. She has Rank looking back on his troubled past from the perspective of a soon-to-be-40-year-old man who has supposedly changed his ways, although it’s clear he is filled with resentment and has a special talent for holding grudges. It’s written epistolary style, in a series of emails to a college classmate, over a three-month period in 2009.

The classmate in question has written a novel which bears striking similarities to Rank’s life — and Rank’s not happy about it. The emails are essentially one long diatribe, railing against the way his story has been stolen from him, pointing out inaccuracies and clarifying events. The bulk of the one-way correspondence is written in the first person, but towards the end — as the story builds to a dramatic and violent climax — it is written in the third person, almost as if Rank has hit his stride and is rewriting his classmate’s novel for him.

The great strength of The Antagonist is Rank’s voice — it’s angry, honest and frank — but it is never predictable. There are little “reveals” dotted throughout the narrative which makes the reader question their own judgement of Rank’s character. Is he really the crazy, antagonistic, guy from college whom everyone liked because he “livened things up”? Or is there a deeper, more emotional and misunderstood man underneath? Does he relish being a thug? Or does he not understand his own brute strength?

This is a fast-paced read, with rich and authentic descriptions of both small town and college life — and there’s a rich seam of humour running throughout. It’s set largely in the 1980s, of the generation to which I belong, so I quite enjoyed the music references. And if nothing else it so eloquently shows that you should never judge a person on appearance alone…

The Antagonist has been shortlisted for this year’s Giller Prize. For another take on this novel please see KevinfromCanada’s review.

Advertisements

6 thoughts on “‘The Antagonist’ by Lynn Coady

  1. I remember reading about this book a few months ago and I thought, “This sounds great.” Then I moved on and forgot about it. It still sounds great and thanks for putting it back on my radar. I’ll add it to the list as to not forget it again.

    Like

  2. It’s an interesting book about an angry young man. I was worried it might be a little too ice-hockey orientated, but the sport only gets a small mention when Rank acquires a sports scholarship to go to college. And while I didn’t mention it in my review, I do think this is one of those books that will probably appeal more to men than to women — quite a feat given the author is female. She really nailed the male voice in this one.

    Like

  3. Many times I’ve heard readers complain that epistolary novels are either dull or too one-sided, so I think it’s doubly interesting that this one is not-at-all-dull (the opposite really: startlingly absorbing) and that its one-sided-ness makes it all-the-more-fascinating. Rank’s process of revisiting the past could have been just another “uh oh I’m 40-something, look at where everything went wrong through a hundred flashbacks” story, but the author’s characterization and voice turns it into a page-turner.

    Like

  4. Funnily enough, epistolary novels are one of my favourite novels to read, but this is the first one I’ve read where the correspondence has been via email, and where there are very many references to Facebook and the like. And I agree, this could have been a dull biography of a 40 year old having a mid-life crisis, but the narrative — and the bitter-edged voice — is compelling from beginning to end.

    Like

I'd love to know what you think, so please leave a comment below

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s