Fiction – Kindle edition; Faber & Faber; 260 pages; 2012.
First published in 2000, Mr Phillips is John Lanchester’s second novel. To be perfectly frank, I hated it.
The story is set on one day in the late 1990s. Mr Phillips, an accountant at a catering services supply company, has been made redundant but is too embarrassed to tell his family. Instead, he dresses for work as per normal and heads off to the train station for his daily commute into central London, where he then wanders around to fill in the hours before he’s expected home.
Written in the third person but entirely from Mr Phillips’ point of view, the narrative painstakingly follows every step, every interaction and every thought he has between leaving home that morning and returning that night. It’s a rather exhaustive narrative, highly detailed and packed with the minutiae of one man’s life.
One thing soon becomes clear: Mr Phillips is obsessed with sex.
My hackles began to rise pretty early on in the book when Mr Phillips, wandering around Battersea Park, runs into a pornographer, who strikes up a conversation with him.
Speaking as a pornographer, I can tell you that the important thing is never to try and work out what a woman is thinking. It only confuses you and they change their minds so much anyway the main thing is just to steam ahead with your plan intact.
And while I know you should never confuse a horrid character’s thoughts with the author’s own beliefs — they are not one and the same thing — I couldn’t help but wonder why the entire storyline of Mr Phillips revolves around one man’s one-track mind. (Well, okay, two-track mind: when he’s not thinking about sex he’s thinking about numbers — he’s an accountant after all.)
Perhaps I shouldn’t have been surprised by the content given the novel’s opening line:
At night, Mr Phillips lies beside his wife and dreams about other women.
But I quickly lost interest in this rather mundane story of a middle-aged man’s (monotonous) interior monologue, and by the time he’s had lunch with his adult son in Soho (and I find out that the son objectifies women as much as his father does) I’d already decided I didn’t much like this book.
Then, when Mr Phillips wanders into a sex club and watches a show, I was positively ready to throw my Kindle across the room. The descriptions were so lurid and revolting I ended up skipping through the entire section and then suddenly found Mr Phillips caught up in a bank robbery. I mean, the whole book is kind of preposterous and not easy to believe.
If I could salvage anything positive from the novel it would be this: Mr Phillips’ expertly drawn characterisation, of a dull boring man with a rich interior life (I didn’t hate him, I didn’t feel sorry for him, I just wish he wasn’t so tiresome) is only matched by the vivid detail of London’s neighbourhoods, many of them familiar to me, such as Clapham, Battersea, Chelsea and Soho, which truly bring the capital to life. But on the whole, Mr Phillips will probably be the worst book I read all year and now I’m not sure I want to read anything else by this author…
This is my 9th book for #20booksofsummer. I bought it in 2012, another 99p Kindle bargain, probably because I wanted to read more by this author. I’ve seen him at many literary events over the years and really loved Fragrant Harbour, his third novel published two years after this one, when I read it in 2010.
Just curious – I usually don’t finish books that I’m not enjoying. Why did you persevere with this one?
LikeLike
I usually persevere in the hope it might get better. Sometimes it actually works.
LikeLike
Ah. I understand
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh, gosh. I think I’m still interested in Capital and Fragrant Harbour, but I agree that another novel about a dude’s inability to stop thinking about women is hardly groundbreaking…
LikeLike
As a short story I might have had more patience with it. But 260 pages stuck inside a man’s head was more than enough to last a lifetime. The book did feel very dated, actually.
LikeLike
Yeah, hard pass. (It’s from 2000, isn’t it? Which—I often forget—was quite a long time ago.)
LikeLiked by 1 person
I read this years ago & I don’t remember much about it except finding Mr Phillips really dull. I suspect its dated quite considerably, thankfully. Having read Capital in the last few years its fresher in my mind & I do agree that Lanchester is excellent at writing a recogniseable London. You’ve convinced me this is not one for a re-read!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Mr Phillips, both the book and the character, *are* really dull. LOL. I have a copy of Capital and I remember that one dividing opinion at the time (isn’t it set during the credit crunch?). I have his earlier book “The Debt to Pleasure” which sounds more like my sort of thing. But I may leave a bit of time before trying something by this author again.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I really do wonder why people write books like this…
LikeLike
I suspect it was a bit of a male fantasy, Lisa. Judging by the reviews on Goodreads there are a lot of people who love this book, so it certainly taps into something but really wasn’t for me (as you might have noticed).
LikeLike
Ah yes, I remember reading one of those a while ago. Written actually by a very talented writer, it was a fantasy about a chance encounter over dinner turning into something more than that, and it was just so silly…
LikeLike
I got sacked once and took 24 hours to tell my wife. I headed off to work and spent a day at the cricket. Guys do spend a lot of time thinking about sex though (which doesn’t mean I have ever found “Gentlemen’s Clubs” interesting).
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, I think there are lots of real life stories about people pretending to still be working when they’re made redundant. I’ve been made redundant twice and both times it was a blessing / relief, but then I don’t have a family to support (just my half of the mortgage to pay) so I guess it wasn’t as financially traumatic as it could have been.
Be interested on a male perspective of this book… my feeling is it might appeal to guys more than it appeals to girls…?
LikeLike
I’m just impressed that you managed to read as much as you did – I think I would have bailed out much earlier. Definitely one to avoid…
LikeLike
I kept thinking it might get better… I was wrong. LOL.
LikeLiked by 1 person
He’s a very good essayist/journalist, John Lanchester. His pieces on the financial crisis are as good as any I’ve read, better really. His non-fiction is generally a must-read.
This sounds, well, less must-ready…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Agreed. I’ve read a lot of his journalism and heard him speak at many events / readings… am hoping this book was, well, maybe just an anomaly…?
LikeLike
I might dump this one off my shelf! I still want to read Capital though, which I’ve heard good things about, and I did enjoy the TV adaptation of.
LikeLike
Yea, I’d give it to the charity shop. 😉 I’ve got a copy of Capital; didn’t realise it had been adapted for TV. I must have been away or something…
LikeLike
It was in 2015 (time has flown, I thought it was last yr!) rather good in a very understated way. Had Toby Jones in.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ah, I bet it was when I was in Australia… I have no recollection of seeing any adverts for it…
LikeLike