1001 books, 1001 Books to read before you die, Author, Book review, E.M. Forster, England, Fiction, literary fiction, Penguin Classic, Publisher, Reading Projects, Setting, TBR40

‘Howards End’ by E. M. Forster

Fiction – paperback; Penguin Classics; 302 pages; 2000.

First published in 1910, E.M. Forster’s Howards End is often cited as a masterpiece of 20th-century literary fiction. Even Forster himself claimed it was his best book (he wrote six novels, and this was his fourth).

Set during the Edwardian era, it’s a tale about the clash between town and country, and the growing gap between the rich and the poor. This is mirrored in the three different families which form the core of the story.

Three families

The well-educated and well-off Schlegel sisters, Margaret and Helen, are half-German and live in London, where they can pursue their interests in the arts. Young, confident women — and with strong opinions — they are idealists who want for nothing.

The Wilcoxes, by comparison, are self-made pragmatists with an eye on social climbing and the acquisition of material possessions to cement their place in the world. They, too, are rich, but they are from new money. They have both a pied-à-terre and a country estate, the eponymous Howards End.

And then there is the lower-class Basts — Leonard, who is an insurance clerk, and Jacky, his older wife, a “fallen” woman whom he has “rescued”. This troubled couple is often short of money and struggle to get by, but Leonard is aspirational and loves nothing more than reading books and going to musical recitals, which is how he comes to meet the Schlegel sisters.

Complex plot

It’s a convoluted plot — heavily reliant, it has to be said, on coincidences to work — which brings all three families together.

I’ve not seen the 1992 film, so I’m not sure how faithful it is to the book, but I’m assuming most people will be familiar with the storyline. If you’re not, it goes like this:

Helen gets engaged to the younger son of the Wilcoxes, then breaks it off, and in the process Margaret befriends Mrs Wilcox, who leaves Howards End to her when she dies. Except the Wilcox family hide this fact from Margaret. Then — plot twist coming up — Margaret, for reasons I cannot fathom given she’s so independently minded and staunchly her own person, marries Mr Wilcox and moves to a new country estate with him. Meanwhile, the sisters drift apart and Helen does a runner, for reasons that become clear later on (I won’t spoil it here). Later, Margaret discovers that Jacky Bast was once her husband’s mistress, but she decides to stand by her man because that’s what she thinks is the right thing to do.

Yes, it’s all a bit dramatic. And I haven’t even mentioned the scandal near the end, nor the murder!

Compelling read

Fortunately, in Mr Forster’s safe hands, the narrative remains sensible — and compelling.

The characters are all wonderfully alive and interesting and enigmatic and flawed and, for the most part, their actions are authentic and understandable. Likewise, the dialogue, of which there is a lot, is excellent: every conversation, argument and intellectual discussion feels real rather than contrived.

Written at the beginning of the 20th century, at a time of great societal, economic, political and technological change (cars, for instance, were slowly replacing horse and cart), Forster captures England in a state of flux, where the new world is colliding with the old world, where the city is growing rapidly and encroaching on the countryside, where the traditional role of women is being challenged by the suffragette movement.

These big themes give the novel an intellectual weight that might otherwise be missing if Howards End was viewed as nothing more than a romantic drama.

Forster, for instance, looks at what responsibility, if any, the rich have towards the poor (the welfare state was in its infancy at the time of publication), and whether it is acceptable for the impoverished to pursue artistic interests, such as music or literature.

He also highlights the hypocrisy in society by comparing the attitudes to sex outside of wedlock for both men (acceptable) and women (improper to the point of being outcast), along with the limitations society places on women and asks if it’s fair to restrict their potential, intellectual or otherwise.

It’s a wonderfully rich, evocative and engaging read. I’m not quite convinced of its masterpiece status — the string of coincidences and the odd death at the end takes away from its credibility — but on the whole, I much enjoyed this book and have promptly gone out and bought a couple more of Forster’s novels.

This is my 12th book for #TBR40. I bought it second-hand so long ago that I can’t exactly remember when I purchased it but the price scrawled in lead pencil on the first page tells me I paid £2.50 for it. 

‘Howards End’ by E.M. Forster, first published in 1910, is listed in Peter Boxall’s 1001 Books You Must Read Before You Die, where it is described as “truly a masterpiece, the novel has moments of real beauty and optimism”.

14 thoughts on “‘Howards End’ by E. M. Forster”

  1. I’m very very very slowly making my way through a Folio Society box set of Forster (I read A Passage to India in 1996, and A Room With a View in 2015!) so it may be a while until I get to this, but it is one I definitely want to read. I don’t remember the film very well, but I loved the TV adaption last year (adapted by the bloke who wrote Manchester By The Sea I think) which was surprisingly witty, not something I’d associated with Forster.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Oh, I didn’t know about last year’s TV adaptation… must look that one up. I’ve since bought where “Angels Fear to Tread” and “A Passage to India” so hope to read those at some point.


      1. I love Passage to India – prefer it to Howards End in fact – though its very many years since I read both. The only thing I don’t like about Howards End is the dreadful Schlegel brother…..


  2. I have been listening to the LibriVox recording (again) this past week, but hadn’t really been thinking about what to say about it. I find it a bland domestic drama redeemed by the most fabulous writing and Forster’s consideration of gradations within the mostly wealthy middle class. Interestingly I found Margaret’s acceptance of Wilcox’s proposal quite convincing, though it reminds me of the novel’s one defect (in my eyes) and that is a male author giving a woman’s POV.


    1. I struggled to understand why Margaret would want to marry someone so much older than herself — she didn’t need the money and she was her own person, staunchly independent and not afraid to speak her mind. But perhaps, having thought about it a bit more since reading the novel, she was after some companionship and to be “redeemed” in the eyes of society — in other words, to be seen as a married woman was more attractive to her than being seen as an opinionated old spinster ???

      I actually think Forster was way ahead of his time when it came to women… and I have no problem with his portrayal of a woman’s POV. I think he also does it very well in A Room With A View, even though I wasn’t much of a fan of that book.


  3. I really enjoyed your review of this, Kim. As you say, it’s a rich, multi-layered story with some interesting societal themes. The recent BBC TV adaptation is well worth watching, as is the Merchant Ivory film which probably remains the definitive version. Samuel West is particularly good as Leonard Bast, capturing that sense of passion for music and the arts.


    1. Thanks, Jacqui. I have added the Merchant Ivory version to my playlist on Netflix so will watch it the next time I”m looking for a movie to view…I missed the BBC TV adaptation and it doesn’t seem to be available on iPlayer any more… might have to be patient and wait for a rescreen at some point.


    1. I can imagine it’s one of those books that improves on a second reading… there’s so much in it and I’m sure I probably missed a lot of the detail / nuances first time round.


  4. Great review, Kim. I would tentatively put it in the masterpiece category because I don’t mind a coincidence or two – it’s also the only one of the three Forster novels I’ve read that I really liked. (The film is also wonderful btw!)


I'd love to know what you think, so please leave a comment below

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.