Author, Book review, Jonathan Cape, memoir, Non-fiction, Publisher, Salman Rushdie, Setting, true crime, USA

‘Knife: Meditations After an Attempted Murder’ by Salman Rushdie

Non-fiction – paperback; Jonathan Cape; 224 pages; 2024.

When Sir Salman Rushdie, an Indian-born British-American novelist, was recovering from the violent knife attack that almost ended his life (aged 75) in 2022, he told his agent and friend Andrew Wylie he wasn’t sure he’d ever write again.

“You shouldn’t think about doing anything for a year,” Andrew told him, “except getting better.”

“That’s good advice,” I said.
“But eventually you’ll write about this, of course.”
“I don’t know,” I replied. “I’m not sure that I want to.”
“You’ll write about it,” he said. [page 86]

And so it proved. Knife: Meditations After an Attempted Murder is a first-person account of Rushdie’s experience surviving an attempt on his life 30 years after a fatwa was ordered against him.

It is deeply personal and told in such a compelling, forthright style that I read the entire book in one sitting.

(At this point, I confess that I have never read any of Rushdie’s fiction but am very much aware of his history because I was a part-time bookseller when The Satanic Verses was released. At the discount book store where I was employed — the now-defunct Libro Books at 191 Bourke Street, Melbourne — we kept the book under the counter and exercised much caution whenever anyone enquired if we had it in stock. I suspect I was far too young and naive to understand the implications of this.)

Attempted murder

In Knife, Rushdie recounts events leading up to the attack — on stage just as he was about to deliver a lecture at the Chautauqua Institution in Chautauqua, New York — and what happened in the aftermath during his long recovery.

“A gunshot is action at a distance,” he writes, “but a knife attack is a kind of intimacy, a knife’s a close-up weapon, and the crimes it commits are intimate encounters” (page 15).

The actual attack took just 27 seconds but left life-changing injuries.

I never saw the knife, or at least I have no memory of it. I don’t know if it was long or short, a broad bowie blade or narrow like a stiletto, bread-knife-serrated or crescent-curved or a street kid’s flick knife, or even a common carving knife stolen from his mother’s kitchen. I don’t care. It was serviceable enough, that invisible weapon, and it did its work. [page 7]

The most striking thing about Rushdie’s story is not that he survived (which, by all accounts, is miraculous) but that he is not bitter or angry about what happened and bears no malice toward his attacker. Despite losing the sight in one eye and the full use of his left hand and suffering numerous wounds to his neck, face and upper body, he is extraordinarily sanguine about it all. His pragmatism, I suspect, comes from living most of his adult life under threat of assassination.

A premonition

Funnily enough, Rushdie, who is an avowed atheist and does not believe in premonitions or fate, claims that two nights before the actual attempt on his life he had a dream “about being attacked by a man with a spear, a gladiator in a Roman amphitheatre”.

There was an audience, roaring for blood. I was rolling about on the ground trying to elude the gladiator’s downward thrusts, and screaming. It was not the first time I had had such a dream. On two earlier occasions, as my dream-self rolled frantically around, my actual, sleeping self, also screaming, threw its body — my body — out of bed, and I awoke as I crashed painfully to the bedroom floor. [page 7]

He told his wife — the American poet, novelist and photographer Rachel “Eliza” Griffiths — he did not want to go to Chautauqua. Still, he did because he knew tickets had been sold and that his “generous” speaker’s fee would “be very handy”. (Ironically, he was speaking about “the importance of keeping writers safe from harm”.)

The book charts his hospitalisation and long recovery and details the ongoing security concerns he faced when he was finally discharged. This is antithetical to his way of living in America — highly visible and “normal”, achieving  “freedom by living like a free man” — after decades of high-security detail and vigilance in the UK. It’s a difficult pill to swallow because he feels guilty subjecting Eliza to this kind of life.

Love letter to his wife

It is Eliza who is the central focus of Rushdie’s narrative. The book is not merely a memoir; it is a beautiful love letter to her — they had been married for less than a year when the attack occurred. (This is his fifth marriage; the previous four all ended in divorce.) The story is imbued with love, gratitude and kindness for Eliza, but also for his two adult sons, his sister and her children, all of whom live in the UK.

There’s also much affection for the literary community which rallied around him, including his good friends, Paul Auster and the late Martin Amis, who were experiencing their own health issues at the time of Rushdie’s attack.

Perhaps the only aspect of the book I was unsure about is the chapter titled “The A”  in which Rushdie imagines what he would say to his would-be assassin if he was given the chance. In his attempt to “consider the cast of mind of the man who was willing to murder me”, he interviews him in his prison cell. The conversation, which is probing but empathetic, says more about Rusdhie than his assailant…

Knife is an extraordinary book. It’s frank and warm and incisive — no pun intended.

Further reading/viewing

If you wish to know more about the fatwa calling for Rushdie’s death issued in 1988 by Ruhollah Khomeini, the supreme leader of Iran, and how it came about, I recommend this excellent 2009 BBC documentary, Salman Rushdie & the Satanic Verses Scandal, which you can view in full on YouTube.

And this weekend, Rushdie’s wife has written a piece about the attack, published in The Guardian, which presents her version of events. It is deeply moving.

17 thoughts on “‘Knife: Meditations After an Attempted Murder’ by Salman Rushdie”

  1. I had an email today to tell me that my order from Readings is in transit, so I’ll come back and read this when I’ve read the book myself.

    Mind you, I should say that I have bought, though not necessarily read, every book that Rushdie’s ever written as a way of thumbing my nose at his persecutors. 

    Like

  2. I was quite relieved when you wrote that you hadn’t yet read any of Rushdie’s fiction, as I sometimes feel rather ashamed that I haven’t either. It looks as if this is a good place to start, and maybe an encouragement to delve into his work.

    Like

    1. I’ve always been a little intimidated by them… and slightly wary of magic realism. I think now I am a much more mature reader I’d probably get on with his work. The trouble is knowing which one to start with… although he does mention in this book that reading his fiction in chronological order is a bit of a “thing”

      Liked by 1 person

    1. He does find parallels with what happened to him and what he has previously written about in his novels, so I suspect if you have read those books this one would resonate even more.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. I tried to read Midnight’s Children and a little saddened to say I abandoned it at about 75-80% read and that has always made me hesitate even when the premise looks good.
    This sounds quite different and clearly is, narrative nonfiction devoured in one sitting. It sounds a bit like a long read feature article in a literary journal and also makes me think of the popularity of Hanif Kureishi’s dispatches since his paralysisng fall in Rome. The troublesome convenience for the writer to use material close at hand and heart, as they enter the precarious 7th decade.

    Like

    1. Oh yes, he also mentions Hanif in this book… it feels like a lot of US and UK writers of a certain age are troubled by health issues. Despite Rushdie’s obvious problems with losing his left eye, unable to use his hand etc he writes that he feels guilty about being happy and in love! I think he’s a bit of an old romantic at heart.

      And yes, this reads like a long form essay…which goes off on tangents, such as finding parallels between his real life and his fiction (apparently knives and blindness feature in his work a lot), recounting other writers who have been stabbed and lived to tell the tale (Samuel Beckett in Paris, Naguib Mahfouz in Cairo) and exploring knives as weapons (and metaphors).

      Like

  4. I’ve Read Midnight’s Children and one of the others, I’ve stalled on reading the Satanic Verses as I always wanted to have read the Q’uran first and haven’t managed that yet! I have listened to an interview with him which had quite a lot of graphic information and I’m not sure I’d be able to read the book – I also wasn’t feeling sure about the “A” section so it’s interesting you say that.

    Like

    1. I’m not sure I could read The Satanic Verses, not because I object to it but that the plot sounds absolutely bonkers and I think most of it would go over my head!

      Like

  5. I’ve also never read Rushdie (I was drafting a response to a prompt for “authors your embarrassed not to have read” and he was on my list!) but this sounds good.

    Like

    1. It’s a compelling read… it just zips along and before I knew it I had read the whole thing. It’s 200 pages but the typeface is nice and big!

      I’m keen to explore his fiction now. Interestingly, he is one of the few authors I do NOT have in my TBR.

      Like

I'd love to know what you think, so please leave a comment below

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.