Australia, Australian Women Writers Challenge, Author, AWW2021, Book review, Dorothy Hewett, Fiction, literary fiction, Publisher, Reading Projects, Setting, TBR 21, Virago

‘Bobbin Up’ by Dorothy Hewett


Fiction – paperback; Virago Modern Classics; 204 pages; 1985.

First published in 1959, Bobbin Up is Dorothy Hewett’s debut novel famously written at her kitchen table in the space of eight weeks whenever her children were in bed. But it’s not really a novel; it’s more a collection of short stories focused on a bunch of diverse characters, all female, who work together at a woollen mill in Sydney during the 1950s.

It doesn’t have a lead protagonist, a deliberate decision by the author, because — as she points out in her “Introduction” to this UK-published edition — “it set out deliberately to tell the brief history of a group of women millworkers […] whose lives interconnected at the mill then separated off as they walked out the gates when the whistle blew”.

In these densely written chapters — which are alive with vivid descriptions of homes and streets and suburbs and beaches and public transport — we meet a bunch of hard-working women whose lives are dominated by their long shifts in the factory.

Gwennie joined the press of women round the bobbin boxes, pushing, shoving, clawing to grab the pitifully few decent bobbins. Bad bobbins made the work harder, the machine mucked up all the time, but there was never enough “goodies” to go round. It sickened Gwennie to join in that mad, vicious scramble. She always hung back and was left with an armful of rough-edged, half-broken fawn ones.

But it’s often what happens in their home lives that makes this book such a fascinating read, for here we are confronted with the reality of being a woman in the middle of the Twentieth Century; where working a strenuous factory job doesn’t excuse you from also having to keep a home, do the housework, prepare the meals and look after loved ones; where the lack of birth control means the threat of an unwanted pregnancy is a constant worry for anyone sexually active; and where men, often violent or abusive (or alcoholic), rule the roost.

The precarious nature of keeping a roof over your head is also a common theme. (In her “Introduction”, Hewett, who was comfortably middle-class and well educated, says that when she first arrived in Sydney from Perth she was shocked by the “poverty and sub-standard housing” in inner-city Sydney where, for the first time, she “mixed exclusively with the working class”.)

Inner-city Sydney

Bobbin Up is a fascinating portrait of inner-city Sydney at a particular point in time, with its slum landlords, tumbled down houses and dark alleyways.

Dawnie walked home through the long, asphalt lanes of factories, filled with managers’ cars, and the steady rattle of machinery. Past the little semis, with cracked plaster walls in yellow, cocoa and liver red, defending their privacy from the street with rows of murderous iron spikes.

It is also an intriguing examination of the working class and wears its politics on its sleeve. Hewett was a Communist Party member (when it was illegal) and edited its paper for a short time. She uses this experience in two chapters at the rear of the book, which focus on Nell, a Community Party member, who edits a bulletin — called “Bobbin Up” — that she distributes at the mill, informing the women of their rights. This eventually leads to a strike.

Here’s the lead story in the bulletin:

“W. H. Holler treats his two-year-old racehorses no better than he treats the women who sweat in his Alexandria mill. This week his strappers at Randwick went on strike — they said Holler was running his two-year-olds into the ground. As three-year-olds they were only fit for the scrap heap. It’s the same brand of greed that Holler uses in his spinning mills… only there it’s women, not horses he’s using up, in conditions not fit for a horse to work in.”

Today we might criticise someone from the middle-class writing about the working class because it’s not “lived experience” and because it’s not really their story to tell, but Hewett explains that at the time there was little, if any, working-class literature in Australia.

“The lives of such women remained a mystery. They could not write themselves, and they had no spokesperson to translate them into literature.”

Unfortunately, reading this through modern eyes, some of the vernacular and the working-class speech feels clunky and “wrong”, but I think the intention came from a good place. Hewett isn’t making fun of her subjects; she’s merely trying to convey them as authentically as possible.

Bobbin Up isn’t perfect, but it’s an impressive snapshot of another time and place, and the storytelling is conveyed in rich, descriptive language that often sings off the page. I really enjoyed being in the company of these complex, hard-working, vivid women, experiencing their struggles and small victories.

This is my 3rd book for #TBR21 in which I’m planning to read 21 books from my TBR between 1 January and 31 May 2021, and my 1st book for #AWW2021. I also read this for Bill’s Australian Women Writers Gen 3 Week (Part II, 17-23 Jan. 2021) but ran out of time to review it in the relevant week. Better late than never, I guess.

And because Hewett was born in Perth, this book also qualifies as part of my #FocusOnWesternAustralianWriters. You can find out more about this ongoing reading project here and see what books I’ve reviewed from this part of the world on my Focus on Western Australian page.

16 thoughts on “‘Bobbin Up’ by Dorothy Hewett”

  1. Well I’m glad I was one of the three birds to be killed. And a very apposite review it is too. It’s interesting that this time round we saw so much of the slum side of Sydney. It must have been very bad to get so much attention. I know when I first went there in the early seventies – and at that stage all the trucking depots were in the inner city – Surrey Hills terraces were all very rough with shanty-like sleepouts tacked onto the balconies and out the back.

    You are right too about middle class writers and working class subjects, that’s almost a perfect definition of Gen 3 Social Realism. But as you say, they were trying very hard to do the right thing

    Like

    1. I have to admit that the accents she gives her characters does grate at times, but I realise she’s just trying to be authentic and it was probably a novelty to her to hear people speak this way. I found the book as a whole a great slice of social realism.

      Like

  2. I’m so pleased to read a review of this. I read it years and years ago before I kept a journal and I’d forgotten so much about it. Books like this deserve to be revisited, so thank you.

    Like

    1. Thanks, Lisa. I don’t really explain the plot (not that there is one) and I’ve not even mentioned the individual characters and outlined some of their stories, but just wanted to give an overview of what the book is about. It’s very densely written and the font in this edition is about 7-point, so I underestimated how long this would take me to read. A 200-page book would normally take a few hours but this took twice that!

      Liked by 1 person

    1. I like that it covers women in all their many guises: married, unmarried, old and young. I think it’s now out of print, but there’s a Kindle edition available if you read ebooks.

      Like

  3. Beautiful review, Kim! I love the way this book is structured, as a series of short stories which also look like a novel. I loved this line from your review – “the storytelling is conveyed in rich, descriptive language that often sings off the page.” It is so amazing that Dorothy Hewett wrote this book on her kitchen table in eight weeks! Thanks for sharing your thoughts.

    Like

    1. Hewett was very prolific (she was mainly known as a poet and a playwright, and only wrote three novels in her life), so I imagine she wrote a lot of her stuff very quickly. She didn’t write another novel until the 1990s…

      Like

  4. You make a good point about how different our attitudes would be to a book like this written nowadays. I had the same experience with a recent read of a British Library Crime Classic written in the 1930s and featuring working class characters. Although the speech etc was a bit cliched, I appreciate the author’s intention to reflect a wider range of characters than was normal at the time.

    Like

    1. Yes, I can understand there has been criticism of this particular Hewett novel but in her introduction, which she wrote in 1985 (so 25 years after the book had been first published) she addresses these concerns. It does feel slightly like she might be justifying her actions and inventing reasons that weren’t there initially, but I can’t condemn her for writing the book she way she wrote it, because it’s such a fascinating read and that kind of history would have been lost forever had she not written it. I think sometimes we need to be mindful of reading things with a modern mindset. And that’s where a good introduction can help put things into context.

      Liked by 1 person

I'd love to know what you think, so please leave a comment below

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.