Fiction – Kindle edition; Faber & Faber; 320 pages; 2011.
The Donor is typical Helen Fitzgerald fare. It’s dark and edgy and asks the question that all her novels seem to ask: if you were thrust into this moral dilemma, what would you do?
The moral dilemma in this tightly plotted and fast-paced story set in Scotland involves a single father, Will, who has to decide which of his twin daughters, Kay and Georgie, to save when they both develop kidney disease, aged 16.
He comes up with a four-point plan and then sets about putting it into action — with mixed results.
An impossible-to-guess plot
As ever with Fitzgerald, nothing is straightforward — she’s difficult to outguess, which makes her stories unpredictable and exciting.
It’s told from two points of view — Georgie’s, which is written in the first person and gives insight into her rebellious nature, and Will’s, which is written in the third person and paints him as a rather dull and passive character. These voices alternate from chapter to chapter, showing the impact of the situation on both the patient and the parent.
Not surprisingly, there’s nothing obvious about The Donor. It would be too transparent (and the story too short) to have Will donate a kidney to his favourite daughter — the sweet natured studious Kay as opposed to the difficult, often nasty and spiteful Georgie — so instead Fitzgerald has him go in search of his ex-wife, a heroin addict in love with a prisoner, as a first step in finding a suitable donor.
This gives the narrative an intriguing twisty angle, but it also throws the believability of the story into question. Much of the plot, along with its vast array of vividly colourful characters, including Preston the 17-year-old private detective that Will hires to track down his ex-wife, are out-and-out bonkers.
Preston coped very well with stress. In the last twelve hours, he’d bought drugs, killed a man and helped save a woman’s life. In the last two weeks he’d tracked down a missing person across two continents and fallen in love.
But if you suspend your critical faculties and just go with the flow, the book is an engaging — and highly addictive — read. It’s laugh-out-loud funny in places, but it has its serious moments too, not least the way in which it looks at the moral and ethical issues surrounding kidney disease, organ donation and the clashes between the middle classes and the underclass. It’s a great book to get stuck into if you are looking for something a little bit shocking and darkly funny.
This is my 18th book for #AWW2018 — I only ever planned to read 10 this year!
7 thoughts on “‘The Donor’ by Helen FitzGerald”
This is Jodi Piccoult territory, by the sound of it. He’s not spoofing her with the “bonkers” bits, is he?
It may well be a spoof of Jodi Piccoult but it is NOTHING like a Jodi Piccoult novel, which I regard as “worthy” and “overbearing”. Mind you, I’ve only ever read one JP novel so perhaps I’m being overly judgemental?
LOL my view of JP is that one is probably enough…
I think if I had to choose which of my daughters to save I would rather be dead. Of course, then they could have a kidney each. Problem solved! In the meantime I think I’d rather not read about it.
Umm… I think you’ve just revealed the plot spoiler, Bill 😉